Review





Similar Products

deep rna seq  (Azenta)
86
Azenta deep rna seq
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/deep rna seq/product/Azenta
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
deep rna seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)  (Biotechnology Information)
90
Biotechnology Information transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Transcriptome Deep Sequencing (Rna Seq), supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)/product/Biotechnology Information
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
deep rna-seq  (Azenta)
90
Azenta deep rna-seq
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/deep rna-seq/product/Azenta
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
deep rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)  (Novogene)
90
Novogene transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Transcriptome Deep Sequencing (Rna Seq), supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)/product/Novogene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
deep rna-seq  (Illumina Inc)
90
Illumina Inc deep rna-seq
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/deep rna-seq/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
deep rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing  (Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd)
90
Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Rna Seq Library Preparation And Deep Sequencing, supplied by Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing/product/Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rna-seq deep sequencing  (Illumina Inc)
90
Illumina Inc rna-seq deep sequencing
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Rna Seq Deep Sequencing, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rna-seq deep sequencing/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna-seq deep sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rna-seq deep-sequencing  (Illumina Inc)
90
Illumina Inc rna-seq deep-sequencing
A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Rna Seq Deep Sequencing, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rna-seq deep-sequencing/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna-seq deep-sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq and RNA-seq libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: CRAGE-RB-PI-seq reveals transcriptional dynamics of plant-associated bacteria during root colonization

doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69903-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq and RNA-seq libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Deep RNA-seq on root samples (Supplementary Fig. ) were also processed by Azenta Life Sciences, incorporating dual rRNA depletion for both plant and bacterial RNA.

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Activity Assay, In Silico, Clone Assay, Comparison, Gene Expression, Expressing